Sam Wheat’s quarterly portfolio data pull
Simulation only. Kellerman & Castle is a fictional firm built for this workshop, operating in no real regulatory regime; nothing here is calibrated to one. Every client name, fund name, value, and return figure below is invented for this workshop. Nothing in this document describes a real client, a real account, or real financial or legal advice.
This is a workshop exercise fixture, written against fictional data for this exercise only. Reusing this format, or the analysis prompts built around it, against a real client’s real data is your own regulated activity, not something this workshop can vouch for.
Pulled by Sam Wheat from the firm’s internal performance ledger, fiscal year 2026, all four quarters closed. This is a plain historical record - ending values and the funds’ own quarterly returns, plus each fund’s most recent allocation split. Nothing below says what anyone should do about any of it; that’s on purpose. Client references below are internal working labels only, not account numbers.
Two tables. Copy each into its own separate file - two workbooks, or two CSVs - not two sheets in one workbook, before you attach them anywhere. That’s what makes this genuinely two distinct files for the Analyst agent to reason across, not one document to read.
Table 1: ending values and quarterly returns, by client and fund
A quarterly return is the fund’s own investment return for that quarter, the same figure for every client holding that fund - a pooled fund’s return doesn’t vary by investor. Ending Value is that client’s own position in that fund at quarter’s end, which reflects both the fund’s return and any net contribution or withdrawal that client made that quarter - the two columns are related but Ending Value is never a pure recalculation of Return %, so don’t expect one to derive the other exactly. “All funds (portfolio total)” rows are a client’s own combined ending value across every fund they hold that quarter, exactly as recorded in the ledger - not a sum you need to (or should) recompute yourself.
| Row ID | Client | Fund | Quarter | Ending Value (USD) | Quarterly Return (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Molly Jensen | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q1 | $412,300 | +3.1% |
| R2 | Molly Jensen | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q2 | $427,850 | +3.8% |
| R3 | Molly Jensen | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q3 | $419,900 | -1.9% |
| R4 | Molly Jensen | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q4 | $441,675 | +5.1% |
| R5 | Molly Jensen | Castle Income Fund | Q1 | $198,400 | +1.2% |
| R6 | Molly Jensen | Castle Income Fund | Q2 | $200,850 | +1.2% |
| R7 | Molly Jensen | Castle Income Fund | Q3 | $202,300 | +0.7% |
| R8 | Molly Jensen | Castle Income Fund | Q4 | $205,150 | +1.4% |
| R9 | Molly Jensen | Legacy Balanced Fund | Q1 | $86,200 | +4.5% |
| R10 | Molly Jensen | Legacy Balanced Fund | Q2 | $88,750 | +3.0% |
| R11 | Molly Jensen | Legacy Balanced Fund | Q3 | $87,900 | -1.0% |
| R12 | Molly Jensen | Legacy Balanced Fund | Q4 | $91,225 | +3.8% |
| R13 | Molly Jensen | All funds (portfolio total) | Q1 | $696,900 | - |
| R14 | Molly Jensen | All funds (portfolio total) | Q2 | $717,450 | - |
| R15 | Molly Jensen | All funds (portfolio total) | Q3 | $710,100 | - |
| R16 | Molly Jensen | All funds (portfolio total) | Q4 | $738,050 | - |
| R17 | Farah Nasser | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q1 | $155,000 | +3.1% |
| R18 | Farah Nasser | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q2 | $160,890 | +3.8% |
| R19 | Farah Nasser | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q3 | $157,833 | -1.9% |
| R20 | Farah Nasser | Kellerman Growth Fund | Q4 | $165,882 | +5.1% |
| R21 | Dario Esposito | Castle Income Fund | Q1 | $220,000 | +1.2% |
| R22 | Dario Esposito | Castle Income Fund | Q2 | $222,640 | +1.2% |
| R23 | Dario Esposito | Castle Income Fund | Q3 | $224,198 | +0.7% |
| R24 | Dario Esposito | Castle Income Fund | Q4 | $227,337 | +1.4% |
There is no “portfolio total return %” row for anyone, in any quarter. Blending three funds’ returns into one combined percentage takes a weighted calculation the ledger doesn’t do for you - if you want that number, you’d have to compute it yourself, and a number you computed yourself is not the same as a number this fixture states.
Table 2: fund allocation, most recent rebalancing
Allocation is a property of the fund itself, not of any one client - every client holding a given fund has the same split. These three figures match Wade Garrett’s own internal fund note (a different module’s fixture, same three fund vehicles), since it’s the same underlying funds.
| Row ID | Fund | Growth-oriented allocation (%) | Income-oriented allocation (%) | Cash allocation (%) | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Kellerman Growth Fund | 92% | 0% | 8% | Last quarter’s rebalancing (Q4) |
| A2 | Castle Income Fund | 0% | 92% | 8% | Last quarter’s rebalancing (Q4) |
| A3 | Legacy Balanced Fund | 55% | 40% | 5% | Last quarter’s rebalancing (Q4) |
Sam